Overview
Status
- LIVE on
Shibuya
testnet - To-Be-Deployed on
Astar
soon (docs will be updated accordingly prior to the deployment)
Approach
Astar
reuses Polkadot’s so-called v1 governance model due to its practicality. The core idea is to further decentralize the network, but not completely re-invent the wheel.
Users are advised to refer to the official docs to learn more about how Gov v1 works.
The Main Council and the Technical Committee will be used the same as in the linked documentation.
A novelty will be the Community Council which will manage certain actions related to the community treasury. This council will be able to approve or reject community treasury spending requests, and will also be able to select which dApps to stake on using the community treasury funds. Additionally, they will have the privilege to fast track dApp registration into the dApp staking system.
Community treasury is an independent treasury account (no ties to main on-chain treasury) which gets primarily funded through the dApp staking rewards. The community council must manage the treasury wisely to maintain profitability while also supporting projects and ambassadors.
Conviction voting is also utilized, essentially being the same as covered in the official Polkadot network Gov v1 docs, with the only difference being in parameters.
Anyone holding ASTR tokens can participate in governance by either proposing, endorsing or voting on a proposal.
Tokens that are locked in dApp staking CAN and should be used to participate in governance. Users can steer the direction of the network while earning rewards.
Quick Overview
To avoid duplicating the official Polkadot Gov v1 documentation, here is a quick overview of the governance system in Astar
.
-
Before a proposal can be made, a preimage of the call must be submitted on-chain. This is essentially the proposal logic the submitter wishes to execute (e.g., upgrade the runtime, transfer funds).
-
Public proposals can be made by any native token holder, and can be endorsed by other token holders. More than one proposal can exist at the same time.
-
External proposals can be made by the
Main Council
. Only one external proposal can exist at a time. -
At the end of each
Launch Period
, either the most endorsed public proposal or the external proposal will be upgraded into a referendum (2 tracks).- Every
Launch Period
will have an alternating round (1st round is for public proposals, 2nd round is for external proposals). - In case no eligible proposal exists for the given round's track preference, the other track will be used instead if a proposal exists.
- Every
-
Once a proposal is upgraded into a referendum, the token holders can vote on it during the
Voting Period
. In order for the referendum to pass, a certain quorum must be achieved before theVoting Period
ends. -
If the referendum passes, the proposal will be executed on-chain after the
Enactment Period
has passed. This is a delay execution mechanism, allowing the token holders to prepare for the changes. -
Conviction voting allows the token holder to amplify their vote by locking their tokens for a certain period of time. The longer the lock period, the more weight the vote has. E.g. voting with 1000 tokens with conviction factor 3 will be equivalent to voting with 3000 tokens but the tokens will be locked for a greater period of time compared to voting with conviction factor 1.
-
In case the voter's vote corresponds to the winning side, their tokens will be locked for a certain period of time. Otherwise the tokens will be unlocked immediately. Tokens never leave the voter's account, they just cannot be transferred or used to e.g. pay transaction fees.
-
Once the lock period expires, user can execute an unlock action to remove the lock and make the tokens liquid again.
-
Token holder can delegate their voting power to another account. Tokens are never transferred, only the voting power is delegated.
-
It is not possible to have both voting delegation & actively vote at the same time. These actions are mutually exclusive.
-
There are 3 types of quorums (reader is strongly encouraged to refer to the official docs for more details):
- Simple Majority requires more than 50% of the total votes to be aye. This is the quorum required for external proposal made by the majority agreement of the
Main Council
- Super Majority Approve adapts to the voter turnout (how many voters participated in the referendum compared to the total token supply). For low turnout, the percentage of aye votes is higher, but as turnout increases, the percentage of required aye votes decreases. This is the quorum required for regular public proposals.
- Super Majority Against also adapts to the voter turnout. For low turnout, the percentage of aye votes is lower, but as turnout increases, the percentage of required aye votes increases. This is the quorum required for an external proposal made by the unanimous agreement of the
Main Council
.
- Simple Majority requires more than 50% of the total votes to be aye. This is the quorum required for external proposal made by the majority agreement of the
-
The
Main Council
can cancel an ongoing referendum if it considers it harmful. This is an emergency action only. -
The
Technical Committee
can fast-track an external proposal in case of an emergency situation. This allows instant upgrade of the proposal into a referendum, and setting of the voting & enactment period to arbitrarily short durations. -
The
Technical Committee
can cancel a public proposal if it considers it to be harmful for the network. -
Any
Technical Committee
can vet an external proposal made by theMain Council
, postponing it temporarily.
Actors
Different actors have different roles in the governance system. When executing any of the governance actions, the origin of the call will determine the privileges it has.
E.g. in case a regular user submits a democracy proposal, the origin will be the user's account, controlled by the user's private key.
However, in case of a Main Council
call, the origin will be the Main Council
collective with some level of agreement, e.g. 2/3 majority.
Such a call will have more privileges than a regular user's call, but it requires some consensus among the council members.
There is a special kind of origin called root
, which has the highest privilege level.
Main Council
The Main Council
will initially consist of Astar Foundation leaders, individuals who have deep investment & understanding of the network & the ecosystem.
The Main Council
can:
- change members of the
Main Council
,Technical Committee
and theCommunity Council
via 2/3 majority agreement - approve or reject
Main Treasury
spending proposals - propose a super majority approve & simple majority external proposal via 2/3 majority agreement
- propose a super majority against external proposal via unanimous agreement
- cancelling a passed referendum via 2/3 majority agreement (this is an emergency action)
Technical Committee
The Technical Committee
will initially consist of Astar
runtime developers since this role requires deep technical understanding of the chain.
The Technical Committee
can:
- fast-track an external proposal
- standard fast tracking requires 2/3 majority agreement, and allows modification of the voting & enactment period durations
- instant fast tracking requires unanimous agreement, and allows setting of the voting & enactment period to arbitrarily short periods (for emergency situations)
- cancel a public proposal (not a referendum!) in case the committee considers it harmful, requires 2/3 majority agreement
- enable or disable maintenance mode on the dApp staking pallet, requires 2/3 majority agreement
Any Technical Committee
member can veto an external proposal made by the Main Council
.
Community Council
The Community Council
will initially consist of a mix of Astar Foundation members with highly involved community members (ambassadors).
The Community Council
can:
- register a dApp into dApp staking protocol, requires 2/3 majority agreement
*utilize dApp staking on behalf of the community treasury, requires 2/3 majority agreement
*approve or reject
Community Treasury
spending requests, requires 2/3 majority agreement
Token Holders
Anyone holding ASTR token is a token holder. They can:
- make a public proposal, putting some ASTR as the deposit
- in case the proposal is cancelled, the deposit will get slashed
- endorse an existing proposal, putting some ASTR as the deposit, and increasing the chance that the proposal gets upgraded into a referendum
- vote on an ongoing referendum
- request a treasury payout